AI NEWS

AI Sifted 80 Million Starlight Records to Find 10,000+ New Possible Planets

3 min read MARS STATION Newsroom · By Spirit, Martian correspondent

A team of astronomers led by Joshua Roth, a graduate researcher at Princeton University, has used artificial intelligence to sift through more than 80 million brightness recordings from NASA's TESS space telescope, turning up over 10,000 new candidate planets circling other stars. It is one of the largest single batches of new planet candidates ever reported at once, and it points to how central AI has quietly become in modern astronomy. The findings, described in a paper titled "The T16 Planet Hunt: 10,000 New Planet Candidates from TESS Cycle 1," were reported this week and have been accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. The work involved researchers from Princeton, MIT, UCLA, and the Las Campanas Observatory in Chile.

How the AI did the heavy lifting

TESS (the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite) hunts for planets by watching for the tiny, repeating dip in a star's brightness that happens when a planet passes in front of it, an event astronomers call a transit. Over its first observing cycle alone, the telescope generated more than 83 million of these brightness recordings, known as light curves — far too many for any team of humans to check one at a time.

Roth's team built a two-stage AI pipeline to handle the flood of data. First, an algorithm called CETRA (the Cambridge Exoplanet Transit Recovery Algorithm), designed to run quickly on graphics processors, scanned every light curve for the faint, periodic dimming pattern that signals a transit. Notably, CETRA was sensitive enough to catch signals from stars fainter than those covered by TESS's official detection pipeline. Next, a machine-learning classifier called Random Forest ranked and filtered the results, narrowing the pool from roughly 80 million light curves down to about 2.5 million that were worth a closer look by the team.

What they found

From that shortlist, the researchers identified 11,554 total transit candidates, of which 10,091 are newly discovered (the rest had already been catalogued by earlier surveys). The haul leans toward objects that are relatively easy to detect: researchers say the bulk are so-called "hot Jupiters," gas giants that orbit very close to their host stars, alongside more than 100 Neptune-sized worlds and 11 candidate super-Earths — smaller, rocky planets that are of particular interest to scientists searching for potentially habitable worlds elsewhere in the galaxy.

As a check that the whole pipeline actually works, the team followed up on one candidate with ground-based observations: using the PFS spectrograph on the Magellan telescope in Chile, they measured the subtle gravitational wobble of a star and confirmed a hot Jupiter orbiting TIC 183374187, an unusual metal-poor star located in the Milky Way's thick disk.

Why AI made the difference

Roth put a concrete number on how much time the AI approach saved. He said that manually vetting 50,000 of the candidates by eye, checking each light curve one by one, took his team about six weeks of focused work. Without the machine-learning filtering step, he estimated the team would have needed to manually check roughly 32 times as many light curves overall — a task that, at the same pace, would have taken about 192 weeks, or well over three and a half years. Instead, the AI-assisted pipeline compressed that workload dramatically, letting a small team accomplish in a reasonable stretch of time what would otherwise have demanded a small army of human reviewers working around the clock.

Caveats and what comes next

It is worth stressing that "candidate" is not the same as "confirmed planet." Transit-like dimming can sometimes be mimicked by other phenomena, such as pairs of stars eclipsing each other, so a substantial share of the new candidates will need follow-up observations, additional transits, radial-velocity measurements, or direct imaging, before they can be confirmed as genuine worlds. Astronomers describe this AI-driven sorting as a first pass that flags the most promising targets for that harder, slower confirmation work.

Even with those caveats, researchers say the approach is quickly becoming essential rather than optional. NASA's Roman Space Telescope, expected to launch in August 2026, is projected to detect roughly 100,000 transiting planet candidates on its own — a scale of data that would be unmanageable through manual review alone. Roth's team says it plans to add further AI tools, including convolutional neural networks, to sharpen the search in future TESS observing cycles, suggesting that AI-assisted triage is set to become a standard part of how astronomers comb the sky for new worlds.

AI NEWS

AI Finds 10,000+ New Possible Planets

A Princeton team used AI to search NASA's TESS telescope data and found more than 10,000 new candidate planets.

2 min read MARS STATION Newsroom · By Spirit, Martian correspondent

💡 The gist

  • AI scanned over 80 million brightness readings from NASA's TESS telescope and narrowed them to about 2.5 million
  • The team confirmed 11,554 total candidate planets, and 10,091 of them are brand new
  • AI turned a job that could have taken over three and a half years into a much shorter task

Why AI was needed

TESS finds planets by watching for a tiny, repeating dip in a star's brightness, which happens when a planet passes in front of it. Its first observing round alone produced more than 83 million brightness recordings. That is far too many for people to check one by one. So the team used AI instead. First, an algorithm called CETRA scanned every recording for the faint dimming pattern that signals a planet passing by. Then a machine-learning tool ranked the results, narrowing about 80 million recordings down to about 2.5 million worth a closer look.

What they found

From that shortlist, the team confirmed 11,554 candidate planets in total, and 10,091 of them are newly discovered. Most are so-called "hot Jupiters," gas giants that orbit very close to their star. The team also found more than 100 Neptune-sized worlds and 11 candidate super-Earths, which are smaller, rocky planets that scientists especially want to find because they might be habitable. To check that the whole process actually worked, the team also confirmed one candidate using a ground telescope in Chile, by measuring the tiny gravitational wobble it caused in its star.

Much faster than doing it by hand

Researchers say checking 50,000 candidates by eye took about six weeks. Without AI's help narrowing the list, what would have happened? Checking everything by hand at that pace would have taken roughly 192 weeks, or more than three and a half years. In other words, AI let a small team do in weeks what would otherwise have needed a small army of people working for years. These are still "candidates," not confirmed planets: dimming that looks like a transit can sometimes be caused by other things, like two stars eclipsing each other, so most candidates still need more observation before anyone can call them real planets. A new space telescope is launching in August 2026. It is expected to find about 100,000 candidates on its own, far too many for people to check by hand. So AI sorting is set to become an even more essential part of how astronomers search the sky.

AI NEWS

A Smart Computer Found 10,000 New Maybe-Planets

Scientists used a smart computer to look at lots of starlight. It found over 10,000 new maybe-planets.

1 min read MARS STATION Newsroom · By Spirit, Martian correspondent

What happened?

A space telescope called TESS watches faraway stars. 🔭 Sometimes a planet passes in front of a star. Then the star's light gets a tiny bit dimmer. Scientists call that a "transit."

TESS took more than 80 million pictures of starlight. That is way too many for people to check one by one. So scientists used a smart computer program instead. The computer looked at every picture super fast. It found the ones with a tiny dip in light. Then it picked out about 2.5 million good ones. Those went to people for a closer look.

What did they find?

People checked those and found new maybe-planets. There are more than 10,000 of them! Most are big and gassy, close to their star. Some are medium-sized. A few might be small and rocky, like Earth.

Checking 50,000 by hand took six weeks. Without the computer, it might have taken years. Maybe even three and a half years! That is a really, really long time. The smart computer helped them go much faster.

These are still just "maybe-planets" for now. Scientists need to check each one again. Finding this many at once is a very big deal.